Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
21 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover the truth behind who builds prisons and the impact it has on society.
Prisons, as the name suggests, are constructed with the sole purpose of incarcerating individuals who have been convicted of committing crimes. However, have you ever wondered who is responsible for building these institutions?
Prison construction in the United States dates back to the early 19th century. Back then, these institutions were constructed by the government and were intended to be a place of punishment and reform for prisoners. With the burgeoning prison population, the demand for prisons grew, and so did the private sector’s involvement in prison construction.
By the mid-20th century, the prison system in the United States had become a massive industry, with private companies competing for contracts to build and manage prisons. This led to concerns about the profit motive driving the incarceration of individuals, and the potential for abuse and neglect in privately-run facilities. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to reform the prison system and reduce the number of people incarcerated, with a focus on rehabilitation and reducing recidivism rates.
Public prison builders are those that are owned and operated by the government, whereas private prison builders are privately owned and for-profit. The main difference between the two is that private prison builders are incentivized to maintain a steady flow of prisoners since they are paid per prisoner by the government. This has raised concerns about whether private prison builders prioritize profit over inmate rehabilitation.
Another concern with private prison builders is the lack of transparency and accountability. Private prisons are not subject to the same level of scrutiny and oversight as public prisons, which can lead to issues such as inadequate staffing, poor living conditions, and mistreatment of inmates. Additionally, private prison builders often lobby for harsher sentencing laws and stricter immigration policies in order to increase their profits, which can have negative consequences for society as a whole.
Government funding is a crucial component of prison construction. The government provides funding to both public and private prison builders in the form of grants and/or contracts. The funding is intended to cover the costs of constructing and maintaining the institutions that house convicted criminals.
However, the allocation of government funding for prison construction has been a topic of controversy. Some argue that too much money is being spent on building and maintaining prisons, while not enough is being invested in rehabilitation programs for inmates. Others argue that the government should not be funding private prisons, as they may prioritize profit over the well-being of inmates.
Despite the controversy, government funding remains a necessary source of support for prison construction. Without it, the burden of financing these institutions would fall solely on taxpayers, which could lead to inadequate facilities and overcrowding. It is important for policymakers to carefully consider the allocation of funding and ensure that it is being used effectively to promote public safety and rehabilitation.
Prison construction has both positive and negative impacts on local communities. On the positive side, prison construction can provide much-needed job opportunities and stimulate local economies. However, on the negative side, prison construction can also have a negative impact on property values, community safety, and the environment.
Furthermore, the presence of a prison in a community can also have social and psychological impacts. Some residents may feel stigmatized by the presence of a prison, while others may feel a sense of fear or anxiety. Additionally, the families of incarcerated individuals may face challenges in accessing resources and support systems, which can further exacerbate existing social and economic inequalities.
Over the years, investing in prison construction has become increasingly controversial due to the ethical implications of profiting off of incarcerating individuals. Some believe that investing in prison construction perpetuates a cycle of mass incarceration, while others argue that prisons are necessary and should be run as efficiently and humanely as possible.
However, it is important to consider the impact of investing in prison construction on communities. Often, prisons are built in economically disadvantaged areas, which can lead to the exploitation of vulnerable populations. Additionally, the construction of prisons can divert funds away from other important social programs, such as education and healthcare. As investors, it is crucial to weigh the potential financial gains against the ethical and social consequences of investing in prison construction.
Prison construction and operation involve a significant amount of money, and the economics behind it are complex. From the costs of construction and maintenance to the wages of correctional officers and healthcare providers, understanding the economics behind prisons is a crucial component of the prison system.
One of the major factors that contribute to the high cost of building and operating prisons is the need for security measures. Prisons require a high level of security to prevent escapes, violence, and contraband smuggling. This means that prisons need to invest in advanced security systems, such as surveillance cameras, metal detectors, and security personnel. These security measures come at a high cost, and they require ongoing maintenance and upgrades to ensure their effectiveness.
Another factor that affects the economics of prisons is the high rate of recidivism. Recidivism refers to the tendency of released prisoners to reoffend and return to prison. This means that prisons need to invest in rehabilitation programs to reduce the likelihood of recidivism. These programs can include education and job training, substance abuse treatment, and mental health counseling. While these programs can be effective in reducing recidivism, they also come at a cost, and their effectiveness can be difficult to measure.
The future of prison construction and operation is uncertain. Some believe that the trend toward privatization and profit-driven models will continue, while others see a growing push for reform and rehabilitation over punishment. Whatever the future holds, it’s clear that prison construction will continue to be an important issue in the years to come.
One trend that is likely to continue is the use of technology in prison construction and management. This includes the use of advanced security systems, such as biometric identification and surveillance cameras, as well as the implementation of digital systems for inmate management and communication.
Another factor that may impact the future of prison construction is the changing demographics of the prison population. As the population ages, there may be a greater need for specialized facilities to accommodate elderly and disabled inmates. Additionally, the growing number of female inmates may lead to the development of more gender-specific facilities.
Some of the notable companies involved in prison construction include the GEO Group, CoreCivic, and the Hunt Companies. These companies have come under scrutiny for their practices and have been accused of prioritizing profit over inmate welfare.
The GEO Group, in particular, has faced numerous lawsuits and allegations of mistreatment of inmates, including reports of inadequate medical care and poor living conditions. In 2019, the company was sued by the state of Mississippi for allegedly violating the state’s contract with the company by failing to provide necessary staffing and security measures.
CoreCivic, formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America, has also faced criticism for its treatment of inmates, including reports of violence and understaffing. In 2016, the company settled a lawsuit for $7.5 million after being accused of forcing inmates to work for little or no pay.
Prison construction and operation can have a significant impact on the environment. From the use of natural resources to the pollution caused by prison operations, it’s important to consider the environmental impact of these institutions.
One of the major environmental impacts of building and operating prisons is the amount of energy they consume. Prisons require a lot of electricity to power their facilities, including lighting, heating, and cooling systems. This energy consumption contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
In addition to energy consumption, prisons also generate a significant amount of waste. This includes food waste, paper waste, and hazardous waste from cleaning supplies and medical facilities. Proper waste management is crucial to minimize the environmental impact of prisons and prevent pollution of nearby ecosystems.
Prison construction and mass incarceration are closely linked. The more prisons are built, the more people tend to be incarcerated. This has led some to argue that prison construction perpetuates the cycle of mass incarceration and negatively impacts society as a whole.
One factor that contributes to the relationship between prison construction and mass incarceration is the use of private prisons. Private prison companies have a financial incentive to keep their facilities full, leading to policies that prioritize incarceration over rehabilitation. This can result in longer sentences and harsher penalties, further fueling the cycle of mass incarceration.
Additionally, the disproportionate impact of mass incarceration on communities of color cannot be ignored. Black Americans are incarcerated at a rate five times higher than white Americans, and Hispanic Americans are incarcerated at a rate three times higher. The construction of new prisons in these communities can perpetuate systemic racism and further marginalize already vulnerable populations.
The political motivations for investing in prison construction can vary. Some politicians may see prison construction as a way to create jobs and stimulate the economy, while others may see it as a way to be tough on crime and win votes.
Another political motivation for investing in prison construction is the influence of the private prison industry. Private prison companies often lobby politicians to increase funding for prison construction, as it directly benefits their profits. This can lead to a conflict of interest, as politicians may prioritize the interests of private prison companies over the well-being of their constituents.
Additionally, investing in prison construction can perpetuate systemic racism and inequality within the criminal justice system. Studies have shown that Black and Brown individuals are disproportionately incarcerated, and investing in more prisons can lead to further over-policing and over-incarceration of these communities. Politicians who prioritize prison construction over criminal justice reform may be perpetuating these harmful disparities.
There are alternative models to traditional prison construction that have gained traction in recent years. These models include community-based alternatives, such as rehabilitation centers and restorative justice programs, as well as smaller, more personalized institutions that prioritize inmate rehabilitation over punishment.
One alternative model is the use of electronic monitoring, which allows offenders to serve their sentences in their own homes while being monitored by ankle bracelets or other devices. This can be a cost-effective solution that also allows offenders to maintain their jobs and family connections.
Another alternative is the use of diversion programs, which aim to divert offenders away from the criminal justice system altogether. These programs may include drug treatment, mental health counseling, or job training, and can be effective in reducing recidivism rates and addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
Activism has played an important role in challenging the status quo of prison construction. Activists have been pushing for reform and rehabilitation over punishment and have been working to expose the injustices and ethical violations associated with private prison builders.
One of the ways in which activism is challenging the status quo of prison construction is by advocating for alternatives to incarceration. Activists argue that many people who are currently incarcerated do not pose a threat to society and could be better served by community-based programs that address the root causes of their behavior. These programs could include mental health services, job training, and substance abuse treatment. By promoting these alternatives, activists hope to reduce the number of people who are sent to prison and ultimately decrease the demand for new prison construction.
Prison construction is a global issue that affects many countries around the world. While the specifics may differ from country to country, many of the same concerns and debates surrounding prison construction remain the same.
Overall, the issue of who builds prisons is a complex and multifaceted one that requires further examination. Understanding the history, impact, and ethics of prison construction is crucial to creating a more just and humane criminal justice system.
One of the major concerns surrounding prison construction is the cost. Building and maintaining prisons can be incredibly expensive, and this cost is often borne by taxpayers. Some argue that this money could be better spent on preventative measures, such as education and social programs, that could help reduce crime rates and ultimately lead to fewer people being incarcerated.
Another issue is the impact that prisons can have on the communities in which they are built. Prisons can bring jobs and economic benefits to an area, but they can also have negative effects on property values and the overall quality of life for residents. It is important to consider these factors when deciding where to build a new prison.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.