Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
21 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
If you’re wondering where you can still smoke in prison, this article has the answers.
Smoking has been a common practice in prisons for many years, but there has been a growing debate about whether or not it should still be allowed. Some prisons have banned smoking altogether, while others still permit it. This article will explore the history of smoking in prisons, the benefits and risks of smoking in prisons, the current laws around smoking in prisons, and alternative solutions to smoking.
Smoking was initially allowed in prisons as a form of control and as a means of calming down inmates. Smoking also proved to be a source of income for prisons as prisoners would purchase cigarettes from the prison commissary. As smoking became more widespread in society, it also became more common in prisons. However, as concerns about smoking-related health risks increased, some prisons began to ban smoking.
Despite the bans, smoking in prisons remains a prevalent issue. Inmates often resort to making their own cigarettes, known as “prison pruno,” which can be made from a variety of materials including tea leaves, fruit, and even toilet paper. The use of these homemade cigarettes can lead to serious health risks, as they are often made with toxic materials. Additionally, the ban on smoking has led to an increase in the use of other substances, such as spice or synthetic marijuana, which can have even more severe consequences for inmates and staff.
There are several benefits and risks associated with smoking in prison. Smoking can help alleviate stress and anxiety, which are common problems for inmates. It can also serve as a social activity and help create bonds between inmates. However, smoking also poses health risks to both smokers and non-smokers. Second-hand smoke exposure is a significant health concern for non-smoking prisoners who share living quarters with smokers. Smoking also contributes to lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory problems.
Despite the potential benefits of smoking in prison, there are also several drawbacks. Smoking can be a costly habit for inmates, who may have limited access to funds. Additionally, smoking can lead to disciplinary action if caught by prison staff, which can result in loss of privileges or even extended time in prison. Furthermore, smoking can exacerbate existing health conditions, such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which are prevalent among the prison population.
Many prisons have implemented smoking cessation programs to help inmates quit smoking and reduce the health risks associated with tobacco use. These programs may include counseling, nicotine replacement therapy, and support groups. However, some inmates may be resistant to quitting smoking, citing the stress and boredom of prison life as reasons to continue smoking. Ultimately, the decision to smoke in prison is a personal one, but it is important for inmates to weigh the potential benefits and risks before making that choice.
The current legislation around smoking in prisons varies from country to country and state to state. In some jurisdictions, smoking is still permitted in prisons, whereas in others it has been banned. For instance, in Canada, smoking has been banned in all federal prisons since 2008. However, this is not the case in the United States, where smoking policies vary from state to state and prison to prison. Some prisons in the US still allow smoking, while others have banned it outright.
There are arguments both for and against the legalization of smoking in prisons. Proponents of smoking argue that it can help reduce tension and stress among inmates, and can also be used as a reward for good behavior. On the other hand, opponents argue that smoking can have negative health effects on both inmates and staff, and can also contribute to a hostile and unhealthy environment. Ultimately, the decision to legalize smoking in prisons is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks.
Research findings show that secondhand smoke exposure causes severe illness. According to The Journal of Correctional Health Care, non-smoking prisoners have an elevated exposure rate to second-hand smoke due to the confined living spaces in most prisons. This exposure puts non-smoking prisoners, particularly those with underlying health issues such as asthma and heart disease at significant risk.
Furthermore, the effects of secondhand smoke on non-smoking prisoners can extend beyond physical health. The constant exposure to smoke can also lead to psychological distress, including anxiety and depression. This can be especially detrimental to those who are already struggling with mental health issues.
In addition, the impact of secondhand smoke on non-smoking prisoners can also have financial implications. The cost of treating illnesses caused by secondhand smoke exposure can be significant, and the burden often falls on the prison healthcare system. This can lead to increased healthcare costs for both the prison and taxpayers.
Smoking poses significant health risks to inmates who are already facing various health problems from extended periods of confinement. According to the World Health Organization, smoking does not only affect the smoker; it also has health consequences for people around them. Smoking in confined spaces, such as cells, poses a significant health risk to inmates who are already dealing with respiratory problems, lung cancer, tuberculosis, among other illnesses.
In addition to the health risks posed by smoking in confined spaces, smoking in prison can also have negative effects on mental health. Studies have shown that smoking can exacerbate symptoms of anxiety and depression, which are already prevalent among inmates. Furthermore, smoking can also lead to addiction, which can further complicate an inmate’s mental health and overall well-being.
There is evidence to suggest that smoking bans increase negative behavior and inmate discipline problems. Some studies show that smoking bans decrease inmate morale, limit personal expression, and create rebellion against prison authority. A lack of social activity due to the loss of a smoking ritual contributes to increased disturbance and may cause some inmates to seek alternative forms of stimulation, such as drugs and alcohol.
However, other studies have found that smoking bans can have positive effects on inmate behavior and discipline. In facilities where smoking is prohibited, there is a decrease in the number of fights and violent incidents. Inmates who quit smoking may also experience improved physical health, which can lead to better behavior and a more positive attitude.
Additionally, smoking bans can have financial benefits for prisons. The cost of providing medical care for smoking-related illnesses can be significant, and by reducing the number of smokers in the facility, prisons can save money on healthcare expenses. This money can then be used to fund other programs and services that benefit inmates and staff.
Addiction treatment programs help inmates to quit smoking by providing them with the necessary tools to overcome their addiction. Smoking cessation classes teach inmates how to cope with withdrawal symptoms, manage triggers like stress, anxiety, and depression. Nicotine patches and prescriptions are provided to prisoners to assist them in their journey to quit smoking.
Additionally, these addiction treatment programs also offer counseling and therapy sessions to inmates to address the underlying causes of their addiction. This can include addressing past trauma, mental health issues, and other factors that may have contributed to their smoking habit. By addressing these root causes, inmates are better equipped to maintain their sobriety and avoid relapse once they are released from prison.
E-cigarettes are increasingly being used as alternatives to traditional cigarettes and have become popular among smokers because they need not tobacco. Electronic cigarettes have minimal smoke, smell, and fewer particles than regular cigarettes. However, some studies have shown that e-cigarettes could have harmful health effects. Nicotine patches are another alternative to smoking, used to alleviate nicotine addiction and prevent smoking-related deaths, however, they have not been administered to prisoners universally, but can be a potential substitute.
Another alternative to smoking is the use of nicotine gum. Nicotine gum is a type of chewing gum that delivers nicotine to the body. It is designed to help smokers quit smoking by reducing cravings and withdrawal symptoms. Nicotine gum is available over-the-counter and can be used as a short-term or long-term aid to quit smoking.
In addition to e-cigarettes, nicotine patches, and nicotine gum, there are other alternatives to smoking that have gained popularity in recent years. One such alternative is the use of herbal cigarettes. Herbal cigarettes are made from a blend of herbs and do not contain tobacco or nicotine. They are marketed as a healthier alternative to traditional cigarettes, but it is important to note that they still produce smoke and can have harmful effects on the lungs.
Cigarette sales pose an economic cost to prisoners and cost to the prison directorate. The hefty costs of selling cigarettes range from the high cost of health care, cost of medical claims on illnesses related to smoking, and cleaning costs on the prison walls. Some prisons sell tobacco on-site due to the revenue it brings to the prison.
However, the revenue generated from selling cigarettes to inmates is often not enough to cover the economic costs associated with it. In fact, many prisons have found that the costs of providing cigarettes to inmates far outweigh the revenue generated from their sales.
Furthermore, providing cigarettes to inmates can also have negative social and health consequences. Smoking is a leading cause of preventable deaths worldwide, and inmates who smoke are at a higher risk of developing smoking-related illnesses such as lung cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Additionally, smoking can lead to increased violence and tension within the prison population, as inmates may become agitated or aggressive when they are unable to smoke.
Recidivism rates are high among former prisoners. This is partly due to the lack of support provided by prisons once inmates have been released. By providing inmates with resources to quit smoking, prisons can help reduce recidivism rates. Supporting smoking-free lifestyles after release can assist ex-prisoners in establishing social networks outside of prison and finding healthful ways to cope with stress.
Studies have shown that smoking cessation programs can be particularly effective in reducing recidivism rates. In addition to the benefits of quitting smoking, such programs can provide a sense of community and support for ex-prisoners. This can be especially important for those who may struggle to find a sense of belonging or purpose after leaving prison. By investing in smoking cessation programs, prisons can not only improve the health and well-being of their inmates, but also contribute to a safer and more stable society overall.
The issue of tobacco-free prisons continues to be a contentious issue. On the one hand, advocates argue that tobacco-free prisons will improve health outcomes for prisoners and provide a safer environment for both inmates and staff. On the other hand, opponents argue that the smoking ban infringes on the inmates’ personal rights, interferes with their ability to manage stress, may lead to negative behavior and could increase violence within the prison.
However, studies have shown that tobacco use in prisons can lead to a range of health problems, including lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory infections. In addition, secondhand smoke can also have negative health effects on non-smoking inmates and staff. Furthermore, the cost of treating tobacco-related illnesses in prisons can be a significant burden on the healthcare system.
Enforcing smoking bans in prisons is an ongoing challenge. Some prisoners will continue to smoke, regardless of the consequences, and will find ways to obtain cigarettes within the prison. Furthermore, corrections officers may be reluctant to enforce a smoking ban as it may result in increased hostility and negative behavior. To mitigate these challenges, facilities could implement gradual decreases in the number of cigarette sales, increase access to cessation resources, and explore the use of nicotine replacement therapies such as nicotine gum and patches and e-cigarettes.
Research shows the impact of smoking may vary between prisons that allow smoking and those that are smoke-free. Prisons that have banned smoking have noted a decrease in health problems like respiratory illnesses, along with a decrease in disciplinary problems. However, inmates in jails allowing smoking have indicated that tobacco can reduce anxiety, stress and help with the social aspects of prison life.
The worldwide debate over the legalization of tobacco within prison often comprises various perspectives. Countries have different policies on smoking in prisons. Examples include the prohibition of tobacco in prisons in New Zealand, with only e-cigarettes allowed, the banning of tobacco in most European countries, and the UK and the prohibition of cigarettes in most states in the US. Many countries are still struggling to develop and abide by guidelines that need to be enforced by staff, with the decision heavily weighted between balancing religious, human rights, and health issues.
In conclusion, the question of where smoking is permitted in prisons remains an ongoing and contentious issue. While there may be benefits to allowing smoking, such as reducing behavioral issues, the health risks and economic consequences of smoking are significant. Alternatives to smoking, like nicotine patches and e-cigarettes, can help incarcerated individuals quit smoking and maintain healthy lifestyles. Further dialogue between prison authorities, staff, and incarcerated individuals, regarding the policy on smoking, would be beneficial to ensure that the health and well-being of prisoners and prison staff are prioritized.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.