Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Blog
17 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover how intensive probation supervision can be a powerful tool in reducing recidivism rates among offenders.
Intensive Probation Supervision (IPS) is a form of community corrections that has gained popularity due to its effectiveness in reducing recidivism. IPS is a type of probation that involves close monitoring of offenders through increased contact with probation officers and the use of technology. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of IPS and its effectiveness in reducing recidivism.
IPS is a type of community corrections that aims to reduce recidivism by closely monitoring offenders in the community. It involves increased contact between offenders and probation officers, the use of electronic monitoring, and other surveillance technologies. IPS programs differ from traditional probation in that they use a range of tools to keep track of offenders and impose restrictive conditions that aim to reduce the likelihood of reoffending.
One of the key benefits of IPS is that it allows offenders to remain in the community, rather than being incarcerated. This can be beneficial for both the offender and society as a whole. Offenders are able to maintain their relationships with family and friends, continue working or attending school, and receive treatment for any underlying issues that may have contributed to their criminal behavior. Additionally, IPS programs are often less expensive than incarceration, which can save taxpayers money while still holding offenders accountable for their actions.
IPS programs work to reduce recidivism by increasing supervision and accountability. Offenders are closely monitored and held accountable for their actions, with increased contact with probation officers and the use of technology. The increased supervision helps to reduce the opportunities for offenders to reoffend and provides support to help offenders make positive changes in their behavior. IPS programs also involve treatment interventions to address underlying causes of offending, such as substance abuse or mental health issues.
In addition, IPS programs often involve community service and restorative justice practices. Offenders may be required to perform community service as a way to give back to the community and make amends for their actions. Restorative justice practices involve bringing together the offender, victim, and community members to discuss the harm caused by the offense and work towards repairing the harm. These practices can help offenders develop empathy and take responsibility for their actions, which can lead to a reduced likelihood of reoffending.
Several studies have shown that IPS programs are effective at reducing recidivism rates. Research suggests that IPS can reduce recidivism rates by up to 50 percent. IPS programs have also been found to be more effective in reducing recidivism than traditional community supervision modalities.
Furthermore, IPS programs have been found to have additional benefits beyond reducing recidivism rates. These programs often include a range of services and interventions, such as substance abuse treatment, mental health counseling, and job training. These services can help individuals on probation address underlying issues that may have contributed to their criminal behavior, and ultimately lead to better outcomes for both the individual and society as a whole.
IPS programs offer several benefits to offenders, including reduced incarceration rates, increased access to services and treatment, and reduced risk of reoffending. IPS also provides offenders with more opportunities to make positive changes in their lives and reintegrate into the community.
In addition to these benefits, IPS programs also have advantages for the criminal justice system as a whole. By reducing the number of offenders who are incarcerated, IPS programs can help to alleviate overcrowding in prisons and reduce the burden on the criminal justice system. This can also lead to cost savings for taxpayers, as the cost of supervising offenders in the community is often lower than the cost of incarcerating them.Furthermore, IPS programs can help to address the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior, such as substance abuse, mental health problems, and lack of education or job skills. By providing offenders with access to services and treatment, IPS programs can help to address these issues and reduce the likelihood of reoffending. This can lead to safer communities and a more effective criminal justice system overall.
Technology plays a crucial role in IPS programs, providing enhanced supervision and monitoring of offenders. Electronic monitoring, such as GPS devices and remote breathalyzers, allows probation officers to monitor offenders’ location and behavior. Technology also enables probation officers to manage caseloads more efficiently, freeing up time for other important tasks.
In addition to monitoring and managing caseloads, technology can also assist in providing rehabilitation and support to offenders. Online counseling and therapy sessions can be conducted through video conferencing, allowing offenders to receive mental health support without having to physically attend appointments. This can be particularly beneficial for those who live in remote areas or have mobility issues. Furthermore, technology can also aid in the collection and analysis of data, which can be used to improve IPS programs. By tracking and analyzing data on offender behavior and outcomes, probation officers can identify areas for improvement and adjust their strategies accordingly. This can lead to more effective and efficient supervision, ultimately reducing recidivism rates and improving public safety.
Despite its effectiveness, IPS programs face several challenges and limitations. IPS requires a significant investment of resources, including technology and personnel, which may be a barrier to implementation. There is also a risk that IPS programs may increase the use of incarceration for technical violations, which can be detrimental to offender outcomes.
Furthermore, IPS programs may not be suitable for all offenders, particularly those with severe mental health or substance abuse issues. These individuals may require more intensive treatment and support than what an IPS program can provide. Additionally, IPS programs may face challenges in maintaining consistent and effective communication between probation officers and offenders, particularly in cases where the offender has limited access to technology or transportation. Another limitation of IPS programs is that they may not address the underlying causes of criminal behavior, such as poverty, lack of education, or trauma. Without addressing these root causes, offenders may continue to engage in criminal behavior even while under intensive supervision. Therefore, IPS programs should be used in conjunction with other interventions, such as education and job training programs, to address the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior.
To ensure the success of IPS programs, it is essential to follow best practices when implementing them. Some of these best practices include involving stakeholders in the planning process, monitoring program fidelity, and using evidence-based practices. It is also crucial to provide adequate training for personnel and to establish clear policies and procedures.
In addition to these best practices, it is important to regularly evaluate the effectiveness of the IPS program. This can be done through data collection and analysis, as well as feedback from participants and stakeholders. By regularly assessing the program, adjustments can be made to improve its outcomes and ensure its continued success.Another important aspect of implementing successful IPS programs is to prioritize the needs and goals of the participants. This can be achieved by involving them in the planning process, providing individualized treatment plans, and offering supportive services such as job training and mental health counseling. By addressing the underlying issues that led to their involvement in the criminal justice system, participants are more likely to successfully complete the program and avoid future involvement in the justice system.
Examples of successful IPS programs can be found across the country. One such program, the Swift and Sure Sanctions program in Michigan, has been successful in reducing recidivism rates. The program’s success is attributed to its strict enforcement of conditions, swift and certain sanctions for non-compliance, and emphasis on treatment interventions.
Another successful IPS program is the Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) program. This program also emphasizes swift and certain sanctions for non-compliance, but also includes frequent drug testing and treatment referrals for substance abuse issues. The program has been successful in reducing drug use and criminal behavior among participants, and has been replicated in other states.
In recent years, IPS programs have undergone significant changes and innovations. For example, some programs are now using cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to help address underlying causes of offending behavior. Other innovations include the use of risk assessments to tailor supervision levels to offenders’ individual needs. As technology continues to advance, IPS programs will benefit from further developments in surveillance techniques and monitoring technologies. In conclusion, Intensive Probation Supervision programs are an effective tool for reducing recidivism rates. IPS offers several benefits to offenders, improves community safety, and helps to reduce the cost of corrections. While IPS programs face several challenges, following established best practices and incorporating new innovations can help overcome these challenges and ensure their success.
However, it is important to note that IPS programs should not solely rely on technology and innovations. The human element of IPS, such as the relationship between the probation officer and the offender, is crucial for the success of the program. Therefore, IPS programs should also focus on providing adequate training and support for probation officers to effectively engage with offenders and provide them with the necessary resources for rehabilitation. By combining technology and human interaction, IPS programs can continue to evolve and improve in reducing recidivism rates and promoting public safety.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.