Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
16 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Find out the answer to the burning question on everyone’s mind: how many years did Joe Exotic get in prison? Our article delves into the details of his sentencing and the events leading up to it.
Joe Exotic, the former owner of The Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park in Oklahoma, was sentenced to 22 years in federal prison on January 22, 2020. His conviction was on multiple charges, including two counts of murder-for-hire, eight counts of violating the Lacey Act, and nine counts of violating the Endangered Species Act.
Joe Exotic, whose real name is Joseph Maldonado-Passage, became a household name in 2020 after the Netflix documentary series “Tiger King” told the story of his life and crime. Before his sentencing, he had been arrested and then convicted of crimes including animal cruelty, murder-for-hire, and illegal trafficking of endangered species.
During his trial, prosecutors presented evidence that he had ordered the killing of a rival and for the euthanasia of tigers to make room for more big cats at his zoo. Furthermore, he had been involved in illegal buying and selling of tigers, including falsifying official documents to hide the fact that he was illegally breeding and selling exotic animals.
The judges in the case considered these crimes as very serious, and hence, Exotic received a substantial sentence.
After the release of “Tiger King,” many people became interested in the exotic animal trade and the laws surrounding it. Exotic’s case shed light on the loopholes in the system that allowed individuals like him to exploit and abuse animals for profit. The documentary also sparked a conversation about the ethics of keeping wild animals in captivity and the need for stricter regulations to protect them.
Since his sentencing, Exotic has become a controversial figure, with some people sympathizing with him and others condemning his actions. His case has also brought attention to the issue of wrongful convictions and the flaws in the justice system. Regardless of one’s opinion on Exotic, his story serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of greed and the importance of upholding animal welfare laws.
Joe Exotic’s conviction in April 2019 came after a jury found him guilty on 17 of 19 total charges, which included murder-for-hire, falsifying records related to wildlife, and violating the Endangered Species Act.
Regarding the murder-for-hire charges, the jury found that Joe Exotic had paid an undercover FBI agent posing as a hitman to kill Carole Baskin, an animal rights activist who founded the Big Cat Rescue sanctuary in Florida. Several witnesses testified that Joe Exotic had repeatedly threatened Baskin, including in videos he had posted online.
The Lacey Act violations related to Joe Exotic’s illegal sale and transport of wildlife products, including tigers and lion cubs, in violation of state and federal laws.
Finally, the Endangered Species Act violations stemmed from Joe Exotic’s conduct in shooting and killing five tigers to make room for new animals at his zoo.
During the trial, it was revealed that Joe Exotic had also been involved in the mistreatment of animals at his zoo. Witnesses testified that animals were kept in small, dirty cages and were not provided with proper medical care. In addition, Joe Exotic had been accused of euthanizing healthy animals to make room for new ones, and of using animals for profit without regard for their well-being.
While Joe Exotic’s crimes would eventually land him in federal prison, his behavior and conduct leading up to his conviction had been problematic for years and led to legal action.
In 2011, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) sued Joe Exotic over allegations of mistreating animals at his zoo, including tigers and lions. A judge ordered that he pay $1 million in damages and turn over all of his animals to sanctuaries, but he failed to comply with these orders and continued to operate his zoo.
In 2017, federal authorities seized more than 100 big cats from Joe Exotic’s zoo following an investigation into animal cruelty and illegal sale of exotic animals. This led to a raid on his zoo, which uncovered massive animal cruelty issues, including multiple sick and starving animals.
Joe Exotic’s legal troubles continued to mount in the years following the PETA lawsuit and the federal raid on his zoo. In 2018, he was indicted on two counts of murder-for-hire, after allegedly attempting to hire someone to kill a rival big cat sanctuary owner. He was also charged with multiple counts of wildlife violations, including killing five tigers and selling and transporting endangered species.
After a highly publicized trial, Joe Exotic was found guilty on all charges and sentenced to 22 years in federal prison. He is currently serving his sentence at a federal prison in Texas, where he has become a controversial figure and the subject of a popular Netflix documentary series.
Joe Exotic’s trial began in March 2019 and lasted for two weeks. Witnesses included former zoo employees, some of whom testified about their involvement in crimes committed by Joe Exotic, including the murder-for-hire plot and falsifying documents.
Jim Rathmann, a former business partner of Joe Exotic, testified that Joe had asked him to euthanize four tigers so that he could bring in new animals to the zoo. Rathmann refused, but Joe Exotic later ordered another employee to kill the tigers.
A former zoo employee testified that Joe Exotic had asked him to kidnap Carole Baskin and bring her to the zoo, where he had planned to kill her. In another instance, several witnesses testified that Joe Exotic had offered them money to kill Baskin.
During the trial, it was also revealed that Joe Exotic had a history of animal abuse and neglect. Witnesses testified about the poor living conditions of the animals at the zoo, including inadequate food and water, and unsanitary living conditions. One witness even claimed to have seen Joe Exotic shoot and kill a horse that he no longer wanted.
The charges against Joe Exotic, including the murder-for-hire plot, had serious implications for him.
The charges of violating the Lacey Act, for example, could have led to up to five years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine for each count. Similarly, the charges of violating the Endangered Species Act could have led to up to one year in prison and a $50,000 fine for each count.
However, the charges related to the murder-for-hire plot were the most serious. If convicted, Joe Exotic could have faced a maximum sentence of 10 years for each count of murder-for-hire.
In addition to the charges against Joe Exotic, there were also concerns about the welfare of the animals at his zoo. The U.S. Department of Agriculture had cited the zoo for numerous violations of the Animal Welfare Act, including inadequate veterinary care and unsanitary living conditions for the animals. These violations raised questions about the ethics of keeping wild animals in captivity for entertainment purposes.
Joe Exotic’s sentence of 22 years in federal prison was seen by many as too harsh, while others believed it was justified given the seriousness of his crimes. Some supporters of Joe Exotic set up a petition for his pardon, which U.S. President Donald Trump rejected in January 2021.
The debate over Joe Exotic’s sentence and whether it was too harsh was not helped by his very public persona, which had garnered a lot of media attention even before his trial began.
One of the main arguments made by those who believed Joe Exotic’s sentence was too harsh was that he was not the only one involved in the crimes he was convicted of. They argued that other individuals who were also involved in the illegal activities received much lighter sentences or were not charged at all.
On the other hand, those who believed Joe Exotic’s sentence was justified pointed out that he had a history of animal abuse and had put many people’s lives in danger through his reckless behavior. They also argued that his attempts to have a hitman kill his rival, Carole Baskin, were not to be taken lightly.
Joe Exotic has claimed that he did not get a fair trial, citing various alleged irregularities throughout the proceedings. However, there is little concrete evidence to support these claims.
Concerns around the proceedings include Joe Exotic’s alleged lack of access to a fair legal team and alleged jury bias, among others. However, these issues have been found to have no merit by the court.
Despite the court’s ruling, some legal experts have raised questions about the fairness of Joe Exotic’s trial. One issue that has been raised is the use of confidential informants in the case. Critics argue that the use of informants who were paid for their testimony may have influenced the outcome of the trial.
Another issue that has been raised is the role of the media in shaping public opinion about Joe Exotic. Some argue that the sensationalized coverage of the case may have influenced the jury’s decision and prevented Joe Exotic from receiving a fair trial.
The story of Joe Exotic and his conviction has brought attention to the issue of exotic animal ownership and the potential for abuse and cruelty within the industry.
Some advocates for big cat welfare have called for stricter regulations and laws around exotic animal ownership and the sale of such animals, pointing to cases like Joe Exotic’s as examples of what can go wrong when such practices are not properly regulated.
Furthermore, the imprisonment of Joe Exotic has also sparked a debate about the ethics of using big cats for entertainment purposes. Many people have expressed concern about the use of animals in circuses, theme parks, and other entertainment venues, arguing that it is cruel to keep these animals in captivity and force them to perform for human amusement.
After Joe Exotic’s sentencing, the future of the many animals that had been living in his zoo was unclear.
However, in June 2020, a federal judge awarded ownership of Joe Exotic’s zoo to Carole Baskin, his longtime rival. She has since taken up ownership and plans on completely revamping the zoo and transforming it into an animal sanctuary aimed at educating people about the dangers of the exotic animal trade.
Overall, Joe Exotic’s conviction and sentencing were the result of years of illegal activity and animal cruelty. His case serves as a reminder of the need to regulate the exotic animal trade and ensure the safety and wellbeing of these animals.
Carole Baskin’s plans for the zoo include creating a more natural environment for the animals, with larger enclosures and more opportunities for them to engage in natural behaviors. She also plans on ending the practice of breeding animals for profit and instead focusing on rescuing and rehabilitating animals that have been mistreated or abandoned.
In addition to the physical changes to the zoo, Baskin also plans on using the space to educate visitors about the dangers of the exotic animal trade and the importance of conservation efforts to protect these animals in the wild.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.