Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
16 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover the shocking truth about the number of deaths that occur each year in privatized prisons.
In recent years, the topic of privatized prisons has gained increased attention, especially regarding the mortality rate within these institutions. Many have questioned how this privatization of prisons has affected the criminal justice system and, more importantly, the welfare of prisoners. Despite the government’s mandate to ensure the safety of prisoners, an inquiry into the number of deaths in for-profit prisons raises concerns about their practices and the accountability of these corporations.
Privatization of prisons in the United States can be traced back to the early 1980s when private prison corporations started to emerge. The growth of these corporations gained momentum in the mid-1990s when President Bill Clinton enacted a law that allowed private prisons to operate at the federal level. Since then, the number of for-profit prisons has risen steadily, housing over 8% of the US prison population today.
However, the privatization of prisons has been a controversial topic, with critics arguing that it incentivizes mass incarceration and neglects the rehabilitation of inmates. In recent years, some states have started to phase out the use of private prisons, citing concerns over safety, cost-effectiveness, and accountability. In 2016, the Obama administration announced plans to end the use of private prisons at the federal level, but this decision was reversed by the Trump administration in 2017. The debate over the role of private prisons in the US criminal justice system continues to be a contentious issue.
There are several concerns about the impact of privatized prisons on the criminal justice system. Critics argue that corporations prioritize profits over the well-being of prisoners and that cost-cutting measures are employed to increase margins. In contrast, defenders of privatized prisons claim that their management results in increased efficiency, leading to safer, more secure, and better-run facilities. However, the mortality rate data from these institutions is a critical safety issue and deserves more scrutiny.
Furthermore, the use of for-profit prisons has been linked to higher rates of recidivism. This is because these institutions often prioritize cost-cutting measures over rehabilitation programs, which are crucial for reducing the likelihood of reoffending. Additionally, the profit motive can lead to longer sentences and harsher punishments, as longer sentences mean more profits for the corporation. This can result in a system that prioritizes punishment over rehabilitation and ultimately fails to address the root causes of criminal behavior.
An investigation by the Bureau of Justice Statistics revealed that between 2001 and 2014, nearly 13,000 prisoners died in custody in state and federal prisons combined. Of those fatalities, roughly 7% were in for-profit prisons. In contrast, public prisons only accounted for 4% of the total deaths in custody during the same period. It is alarming to note that prisoners in private prisons died at a rate 28% higher than those in public ones.
Further analysis of the data shows that the leading causes of death in private prisons were suicide, drug overdose, and homicide. In fact, the suicide rate in private prisons was twice as high as in public prisons. This raises concerns about the quality of mental health care and support provided to inmates in private prisons. Additionally, the investigation found that private prisons had lower staffing levels and less experienced staff, which may have contributed to the higher death rates. These findings highlight the need for increased oversight and regulation of privatized prisons to ensure the safety and well-being of inmates.
Many factors contribute to deaths in prisons, including natural causes, homicides, suicides, and accidents. However, data shows that natural causes (36%) and suicides (34%) make up the majority of deaths in for-profit institutions. This discrepancy is significant when compared to public facilities, where natural causes (57%) account for most deaths.
One possible explanation for the higher rate of suicides in private prisons is the lack of mental health resources available to inmates. Private prisons often prioritize profit over providing adequate healthcare, including mental health services. This can lead to a higher incidence of mental health issues among inmates, which in turn increases the risk of suicide.
Another factor that may contribute to the higher rate of deaths in private prisons is the lack of oversight and accountability. Private prisons are not subject to the same level of scrutiny as public facilities, and there have been numerous reports of abuse and neglect in these institutions. Without proper oversight, it is difficult to ensure that inmates receive the care and support they need to stay healthy and safe.
Because they are responsible for the welfare of the country’s imprisoned population, it is the government’s responsibility to ensure that prisons are safe and secure. State governments are responsible for overseeing private prisons to minimize hospitalizations, fatalities, and other adverse incidents. However, critics claim that government oversight is inadequate, and policies are not rigorous enough to monitor private prisons’ performance adequately.
One of the main concerns with privatized prisons is that they are often motivated by profit rather than the well-being of the inmates. This can lead to cost-cutting measures that compromise the safety and health of prisoners. For example, some private prisons have been found to provide inadequate medical care, leading to preventable deaths.
In addition to government oversight, there is also a need for increased transparency and accountability in the private prison industry. This includes regular reporting on incidents and conditions within the facilities, as well as public access to information about the companies that operate them. By holding private prisons to higher standards and ensuring that they are held accountable for any violations, we can work towards a safer and more just system of incarceration.
The fundamental premise of prisons is that they are correctional facilities to aid offenders in reforming their behavior. Advocates feel that privatization of prisons conflicts with the ideology of incarceration, focusing on profits over rehabilitation and prisoner welfare. They claim that private prisons may neglect issues such as medical care, rehabilitation, and education to reduce expenses in their quest to generate profits.
Furthermore, critics argue that privatization of prisons creates a conflict of interest, as the companies running the prisons have a financial incentive to keep prisoners incarcerated for longer periods of time. This can lead to harsher sentencing and a higher rate of recidivism, as prisoners are not given the necessary tools to successfully reintegrate into society.
On the other hand, proponents of privatization argue that it can lead to cost savings for taxpayers and increased efficiency in the management of prisons. They also claim that private prisons are subject to the same regulations and oversight as public prisons, ensuring that prisoner welfare is not compromised.
The death rate underscores the differences in the care provided in public versus private prisons. Public prisons have come under fire in recent years for their failure to address prisoner rights, but at least the incidence of mortality is lower. For instance, the National Institute of Corrections found that between 2001 and 2014, the mortality rate was 19 per 10,000 inmates in state-run prisons. In comparison, prisoners died at a rate of 20 per 10,000 in privately-managed prisons.
However, it is important to note that the reasons for the higher death rate in private prisons are not entirely clear. Some experts suggest that the profit-driven nature of private prisons may lead to cost-cutting measures that compromise the health and safety of inmates. Others argue that the higher death rate in private prisons may be due to the fact that they house a higher proportion of older and sicker inmates, who are more likely to die in custody.
Despite the controversy surrounding private prisons, they continue to operate in many parts of the world. In the United States, for example, private prisons house around 8% of the total prison population. However, in recent years, there has been a growing movement to end the use of private prisons, with critics arguing that they are less accountable and less effective than their public counterparts.
The deaths of prisoners in private prisons impact not only the inmates themselves but also their loved ones. In interviews conducted with those who have lost family members in private prisons, the bereaved families claim that they were not provided with full information regarding the circumstances surrounding the deaths of their loved ones. These families take issue with the lack of transparency and accountability in private prisons.
Furthermore, some families have reported that they were not notified of their loved one’s death until days or even weeks after it occurred. This lack of communication and delay in notification has caused additional emotional distress for the families. They feel that private prisons prioritize profit over the well-being of their inmates and their families. These interviews shed light on the need for increased oversight and regulation of private prisons to ensure that the rights and safety of inmates and their families are protected.
Advocates of reform suggest improvements such as effective medication programs, better training for staff on mental health, investing in correctional education, and improving the mental and physical health of inmates. They also believe that reforms to mandatory sentencing laws could help reduce the number of prisoners, thereby reducing overcrowding and the resulting adverse outcomes. Additionally, the implementation of checks and balances to ensure accountability within private prisons could help prevent fatalities.
Another area of concern for advocates of reform is the lack of transparency and oversight in for-profit prisons. Many of these facilities are not subject to the same regulations and reporting requirements as publicly-run prisons, making it difficult to assess the conditions and treatment of inmates. Some advocates argue that increased transparency and oversight, including regular inspections and public reporting of data on inmate health and safety, could help improve conditions and prevent fatalities in for-profit prisons.
The number of people incarcerated in the US has risen dramatically in recent decades. As more people are sent to prison, the demand for private prisons also increases, boosting the profits of these corporations. Critics argue that private prisons, lobbying to protect their interests, may be keeping non-violent offenders behind bars longer than necessary, negatively impacting the inmates, their families, and the communities where they live.
Some experts believe that reducing the overall number of prisoners is key in reducing the number of prisoner deaths. Alternative solutions, including community-based justice models, are being explored as changes to the criminal justice system. This model involves empowering communities to resolve conflicts using community-based mediation and restorative justice sessions. It reduces the number of crimes committed and leads to lower incarceration rates.
Despite the belief that imprisonment is a great equalizer, incarceration statistics demonstrate otherwise. Statistics show that black men are more likely to end up in prison, and those in for-profit prisons die at even higher rates in it than other races. The intersection between race, class, and death rates in private prisons is complicated and needs deeper analysis.
Despite the seeming success of private prisons in certain countries, numerous nations do not allow private prisons, with some even advocating for their abolition. A few of these countries include Denmark, Germany, and Sweden. Disability justice experts within American prisons, like Mariame Kaba, point to successful prison abolition efforts as models for a future US prison system.
As private companies are making money from prisoners, there is a need to ensure that these companies prioritize prisoner welfare, safety and implement effective reforms to reduce the frequency of deaths. To do so, stringent government oversight of private prisons is required, transparency and accountability need to be prioritized, and ongoing reform programs that focus on the health, education, and rehabilitation of prisoners must be put in place. With compassion, creativity, and cooperation, we believe that the criminal justice system can be made safer, more equitable, and more effective for all Americans.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.