Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
16 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover the shocking truth about the number of Maryland inmates currently serving time for violent crimes.
Maryland, like many other states in the United States, is grappling with the problem of violent crime. One of the ways in which the state has sought to address the issue is by imprisoning offenders who have committed acts of violence. The question that arises, then, is how many Maryland inmates are in prison for violent crimes? To answer this question, we need to take a closer look at the state’s prison population and the types of crimes that incarcerate them.
According to the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, as of August 2021, the state’s prison population was just over 18,000 inmates. Of these, nearly 14,000 were male, while the remaining 4,000 were female. In terms of race, African American inmates make up around 72% of the prison population, while White inmates make up around 21%.
Additionally, the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services reports that the average age of inmates in the state’s prisons is 36 years old. Furthermore, the majority of inmates are serving sentences for non-violent offenses, such as drug-related crimes or property offenses.
It is also worth noting that Maryland has been working to reduce its prison population in recent years through various initiatives, such as expanding access to drug treatment programs and implementing alternative sentencing options for non-violent offenders. Despite these efforts, however, the state’s prison population remains one of the highest in the country.
Violent crimes are some of the most serious offenses that an individual can commit. These offenses can include murder, rape, and assault, among others. They are considered serious because they have a lasting impact on the individuals who are directly affected, as well as on society as a whole. Violent crimes can cause physical harm, emotional trauma, and financial distress to victims, families, and communities. It is for this reason that society has deemed it necessary to imprison individuals who have committed acts of violence.
However, imprisonment alone may not be enough to address the root causes of violent crimes. Many individuals who commit violent crimes have experienced trauma, poverty, and other forms of social disadvantage. Addressing these underlying issues through social programs and support services may be more effective in preventing future violent crimes.
Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that certain groups, such as people of color and those from low-income backgrounds, are disproportionately affected by violent crimes. This highlights the need for systemic change and addressing issues of inequality and discrimination in society.
According to data from the Maryland Statistical Analysis Center, the most common type of violent crime committed in Maryland is aggravated assault, which accounted for over 7,000 incidents in 2019. The second most common type of violent crime was robbery, with just over 5,500 incidents, followed by rape and murder.
It is important to note that while these types of violent crimes are the most common in Maryland, the overall rate of violent crime in the state has been decreasing in recent years. In fact, the total number of violent crimes reported in Maryland in 2019 was the lowest it has been in over a decade.
However, despite this decrease, certain areas of Maryland still experience higher rates of violent crime than others. For example, Baltimore City consistently has one of the highest rates of violent crime in the state, with a particularly high number of homicides each year.
Maryland has a relatively high incarceration rate compared to other states in the US. According to data from the Prison Policy Initiative, as of 2021, Maryland had an incarceration rate of around 500 per 100,000 residents. This is higher than the national average, which stands at around 400 per 100,000 residents. However, it is worth noting that Maryland’s incarceration rate has been declining in recent years due to reforms in the criminal justice system.
One factor that may contribute to Maryland’s high incarceration rate is its tough stance on drug offenses. In 2014, Maryland passed a law that imposed mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses, which has been criticized for disproportionately affecting communities of color. However, in 2021, the state legislature passed a bill that repealed mandatory minimums for drug offenses, which may help to reduce the state’s incarceration rate even further.
Another factor that may contribute to Maryland’s high incarceration rate is its use of private prisons. As of 2021, Maryland has contracts with two private prison companies to house state inmates. Critics argue that private prisons have a financial incentive to keep inmates incarcerated for longer periods of time, which may contribute to higher incarceration rates. However, in recent years, there has been a growing movement to end the use of private prisons in Maryland and other states.
Mandatory minimum sentencing laws have had a significant impact on Maryland’s prison population. These laws require judges to impose a minimum sentence for certain crimes, regardless of the circumstances of the offense or the offender’s criminal history. According to a report by the Justice Policy Institute, the implementation of mandatory minimum sentencing laws in Maryland resulted in a rapid increase in the state’s prison population, particularly among African American and Hispanic individuals. The report also found that mandatory minimum sentencing laws did little to reduce crime and have had a disproportionate impact on communities of color.
Furthermore, mandatory minimum sentencing laws have also been criticized for limiting judicial discretion and preventing judges from considering individual circumstances when determining a sentence. This has led to cases where individuals who may not pose a significant threat to society are given harsh sentences that do not fit the crime they committed.
Additionally, the implementation of mandatory minimum sentencing laws has also had a significant financial impact on Maryland’s criminal justice system. The cost of incarcerating individuals for longer periods of time has put a strain on the state’s budget, leading to cuts in other areas such as education and healthcare. This has raised concerns about the long-term sustainability of mandatory minimum sentencing laws and their impact on the overall well-being of the state.
The racial disparities in Maryland’s criminal justice system are a cause for concern. According to a report by the Maryland Judiciary Racial & Ethnic Fairness Commission, African American individuals are overrepresented in Maryland’s criminal justice system, accounting for around 30% of the state’s population but over 60% of its prison population. This disparity is exacerbated by the fact that African American individuals are more likely to be sentenced to longer prison terms and less likely to receive parole or probation than their White counterparts.
Furthermore, studies have shown that these disparities are not solely due to differences in criminal behavior between racial groups, but also due to systemic biases within the criminal justice system. For example, African American individuals are more likely to be stopped, searched, and arrested by police, even when they have not committed a crime. This over-policing of African American communities contributes to the disproportionate representation of African Americans in the criminal justice system.
The cost of housing inmates is significant and can place a strain on the state’s budget. According to a report by the Vera Institute of Justice, Maryland spent over $1.3 billion on corrections in 2015 alone, which accounted for around 5% of the state’s general fund expenditures. The report also found that the cost of incarcerating an individual in Maryland was around $45,000 per year. This means that reducing Maryland’s prison population could result in significant cost savings for taxpayers.
Furthermore, the cost of housing inmates is not just limited to the state’s budget. Taxpayers also bear the burden of these costs through increased taxes. As the cost of corrections continues to rise, taxpayers may see an increase in their taxes to cover these expenses. Therefore, reducing the number of inmates in Maryland’s prisons not only benefits the state’s budget but also helps to alleviate the financial burden on taxpayers.
One approach to reducing Maryland’s prison population is through the use of alternative sentencing options, such as rehabilitation programs. These programs aim to support offenders in addressing the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior, such as substance abuse or mental health problems. Research has shown that rehabilitation programs can be effective in reducing recidivism rates, which could ultimately lead to a reduction in Maryland’s prison population.
However, the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs can vary depending on the individual and the program itself. Some programs may not adequately address the specific needs of certain offenders, leading to a higher likelihood of recidivism. Additionally, the availability and accessibility of these programs can also be a barrier for some offenders, particularly those in rural or low-income areas.
Despite these challenges, many advocates argue that investing in rehabilitation programs is a more cost-effective and humane approach to addressing crime than incarceration. By providing offenders with the tools and support they need to address the root causes of their criminal behavior, rehabilitation programs have the potential to not only reduce recidivism rates but also improve the overall well-being of individuals and communities affected by crime.
Preventing violent crime in Maryland requires a community-focused approach. Engaging with communities to identify issues, develop solutions, and build relationships between law enforcement and community members can go a long way in reducing violence. Initiatives such as community policing, restorative justice, and community-based violence prevention programs can all play a role in preventing violent crime in Maryland.
In conclusion, Maryland’s prison population is made up of a significant number of inmates who have committed violent crimes. While imprisoning violent offenders may be necessary to protect society, it is important to consider alternative approaches to reduce Maryland’s prison population, such as rehabilitation programs and community engagement initiatives. By taking a more holistic approach to criminal justice, Maryland can reduce its reliance on incarceration, support individuals in addressing the underlying causes of their criminal behavior, and ultimately create a safer and more just society for all.
One example of a successful community engagement initiative in Maryland is the Baltimore City Community Mediation Program. This program provides free mediation services to residents, allowing them to resolve conflicts peacefully and avoid resorting to violence. The program also offers training and support to community members who want to become volunteer mediators. By empowering residents to take an active role in preventing violence, the Baltimore City Community Mediation Program has helped to reduce crime and build stronger, more resilient communities.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.