Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
16 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover the truth about how many felons actually vote from prison in the US.
Prison voting has been a hotly debated issue in the US for many years. With an estimated 6.1 million Americans unable to vote due to prior felony convictions, many are left wondering how many known felons vote from prison in the US. In this article, we will explore the legal landscape of prison voting, the history of felon disenfranchisement in America, the debate over the right of prisoners to vote, and much more.
Currently, there is no federal law prohibiting prisoners from voting in federal elections. However, individual states have the power to determine their own policies on prisoner voting. As of 2021, only two states—Maine and Vermont—allow prisoners to vote from prison, while most states prohibit prisoners from voting while incarcerated, but restore voting rights upon release. Some states also require ex-felons to complete parole or probation before having their rights restored.
Advocates for prisoner voting argue that denying prisoners the right to vote is a violation of their constitutional rights and perpetuates the disenfranchisement of marginalized communities. They also argue that allowing prisoners to vote can help to reduce recidivism rates and promote civic engagement.
Opponents of prisoner voting argue that it undermines the integrity of the electoral process and sends the wrong message to law-abiding citizens. They also argue that prisoners have forfeited their right to vote by committing crimes and that restoring their voting rights could be seen as a reward for bad behavior.
The history of disenfranchisement in America can be traced back to the colonial era. In the late 1800s, many states began enacting laws that aimed to bar African Americans—many of whom were former slaves—from voting. These laws included poll taxes, literacy tests, and other measures that prevented Black people from participating in the democratic process. Today, laws surrounding felon disenfranchisement are often seen as a continuation of these earlier discriminatory practices.
In the early 1900s, the number of states with felon disenfranchisement laws increased significantly. By the mid-20th century, nearly every state had some form of felon disenfranchisement on the books. However, in recent years, there has been a growing movement to reform these laws and restore voting rights to people with felony convictions.
Currently, there is a patchwork of laws across the country regarding felon disenfranchisement. Some states permanently strip voting rights from people with felony convictions, while others restore voting rights after completion of their sentence. The issue remains a contentious one, with advocates arguing that denying voting rights to people with felony convictions is a violation of their civil rights, while opponents argue that it is a necessary consequence of committing a serious crime.
The debate over prisoner voting rights is complicated and multifaceted. Some argue that prisoners should have the right to vote, as they are still citizens of the US and should not be stripped of their rights simply because they are incarcerated. Others argue that prisoners have committed crimes that have violated the social contract, and that this justifies their exclusion from the democratic process. Still others point out that felon disenfranchisement policies disproportionately affect people of color, and that this is evidence of systemic racism.
Furthermore, there are also concerns about the impact of denying prisoners the right to vote on their rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Advocates for prisoner voting rights argue that allowing prisoners to participate in the democratic process can help them feel more connected to society and invested in its outcomes, which can in turn reduce recidivism rates. However, opponents of prisoner voting rights argue that allowing prisoners to vote could lead to a situation where politicians pander to incarcerated populations in order to win their votes, rather than focusing on the needs of law-abiding citizens.
As of 2021, it is estimated that there are currently around 2.3 million people incarcerated in US prisons and jails. Of these, a significant number are incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenses. Additionally, many prisoners are held in pre-trial detention, meaning they have not yet been convicted of a crime.
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with approximately 655 people per 100,000 population behind bars. This is a significant increase from the 1970s, when the incarceration rate was around 100 per 100,000 population. The high rate of incarceration has been attributed to a number of factors, including mandatory minimum sentencing laws, the war on drugs, and the privatization of prisons.
The percentage of felons who are eligible to vote varies by state. In some states, all felons who have completed their sentences—including those who are on parole or probation—are eligible to vote. In others, only some felons are eligible to vote. For example, in Maine and Vermont, prisoners are eligible to vote regardless of the crime they have committed. In Florida, by contrast, felons who have completed their sentences are eligible to vote only if they have paid all fines and fees associated with their convictions.
It is important to note that the issue of felon voting rights is a controversial one, with arguments on both sides. Supporters of felon voting rights argue that denying the right to vote perpetuates a cycle of disenfranchisement and undermines the principles of democracy. Opponents, on the other hand, argue that felons have violated the social contract and should not be granted the privilege of voting. Regardless of one’s stance on the issue, it is clear that the laws surrounding felon voting rights are complex and vary widely across the United States.
The impact of felon voting on elections is difficult to measure. Some experts argue that the exclusion of felons from the electoral process skews election outcomes, particularly in states with large numbers of incarcerated individuals. Others argue that, given the relatively small number of felons who are actually registered to vote, the impact on election outcomes is likely quite small.
However, it is important to note that the impact of felon disenfranchisement goes beyond just election outcomes. It also has significant social and economic consequences. Studies have shown that felons who are able to vote are more likely to reintegrate into society and become productive citizens. This, in turn, reduces recidivism rates and saves taxpayers money on incarceration costs.
Furthermore, the issue of felon voting rights has become a topic of intense debate in recent years. Some states have taken steps to restore voting rights to felons who have completed their sentences, while others continue to enforce strict disenfranchisement laws. This has led to a patchwork of policies across the country, with some states allowing felons to vote while others do not. The lack of consistency in these policies has created confusion and controversy, and has made it difficult for felons to know their rights and for election officials to enforce the law.
In states that allow prisoners to vote from prison, there are often special procedures in place to ensure that voting is carried out in a secure and fair manner. For example, in Vermont, prisoners are given absentee ballots that they can mail in or submit to a designated election official. In Maine, prisoners are able to cast their votes in person at designated polling places within the prison.
However, not all states allow prisoners to vote from prison. In fact, only two states, Vermont and Maine, have laws that allow prisoners to vote while serving their sentences. In other states, felons may have their voting rights restored after they have completed their sentences or after a certain period of time has passed.
Advocates for prisoner voting rights argue that allowing prisoners to vote can help them feel more connected to society and can encourage them to become more engaged in the political process. However, opponents argue that prisoners have forfeited their right to vote by committing crimes and that allowing them to vote could be seen as rewarding bad behavior.
As previously noted, states have the power to determine their own policies when it comes to prisoner voting. This means that state-level elections officials and lawmakers hold a great deal of influence when it comes to the availability of voting options for prisoners. As such, advocates for prisoners’ rights have focused their efforts on educating and lobbying state officials and lawmakers to change their policies on prisoner voting.
Some states have taken steps to expand voting rights for prisoners. For example, Vermont and Maine allow prisoners to vote while serving their sentences. Other states, such as Florida and Iowa, have recently passed laws that restrict voting rights for people with felony convictions. These laws have faced legal challenges and criticism from advocates who argue that they disproportionately affect communities of color and perpetuate voter suppression.
As previously mentioned, the issue of felon disenfranchisement has a long and complicated history when it comes to issues of race. In the present day, research has shown that felon disenfranchisement policies disproportionately affect people of color. For example, in Florida, more than one in five Black adults are disenfranchised due to prior felony convictions.
Furthermore, studies have found that the racial disparities in felon disenfranchisement are not just limited to the Southern states, but are present across the country. In some states, such as Iowa and Kentucky, the rate of disenfranchisement for Black individuals is more than four times higher than that of white individuals.
It is important to note that felon disenfranchisement not only affects individuals who have been convicted of a felony, but also their families and communities. When a large number of people in a community are unable to vote, it can lead to a lack of representation and a feeling of disempowerment. This can have a negative impact on the overall health and well-being of the community.
Over the past few years, many states have begun to change their policies on felon voting. In 2018, Florida voters passed a ballot measure that restored voting rights to many formerly incarcerated individuals. Similarly, in 2020, California passed a law that will restore voting rights to more than 50,000 people who have been convicted of felonies but are currently on parole.
Other states have also made changes to their policies on felon voting. In 2019, Colorado passed a law that allows individuals who are on parole to vote. This change affected approximately 11,000 people in the state. Additionally, in 2021, Virginia became the first state in the South to pass a law that automatically restores voting rights to individuals who have completed their sentences for felony convictions.
These changes in policy reflect a growing recognition that denying voting rights to individuals who have been convicted of felonies can perpetuate a cycle of disenfranchisement and marginalization. By restoring voting rights, states are giving formerly incarcerated individuals a voice in the democratic process and helping to promote a more inclusive and equitable society.
It is difficult to predict what the future will hold when it comes to felon voting rights in America. What seems clear, however, is that the issue is becoming more and more prominent in public discourse, and that many people are advocating for change. Over the coming years, we can expect to see continued efforts to expand voting rights for prisoners and formerly incarcerated individuals.
Finally, it is important to note the broader social and political implications of restoring voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals. Given that many prisoners and ex-felons come from historically marginalized communities, restoring their right to vote is an important step towards improving political representation for all Americans. Additionally, giving formerly incarcerated individuals a voice in the political process can help to reintegrate them into society, and may reduce recidivism rates over the long term.
Overall, the issue of how many known felons vote from prison in the US is a complex and multifaceted one. By exploring the legal landscape of prison voting, the history of felon disenfranchisement in America, the debate over the right of prisoners to vote, and other related topics, we can begin to understand the broader implications of this issue for our democracy and our society as a whole.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.