Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
17 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
This article explores the question of whether recidivism is an accurate measure of correctional success.
When it comes to measuring the success of correctional facilities, one commonly used indicator is recidivism. However, the question remains: does recidivism truly measure correctional success?
Recidivism refers to the reoffending behavior of individuals who have previously been convicted of a crime. It is measured by analyzing data on whether individuals who have been released from correctional facilities end up committing new crimes and being re-arrested within a certain period of time.
The length of time used to measure recidivism can vary, but it is commonly measured over a three-year period. However, it’s important to note that recidivism does not account for the severity or frequency of the new crimes committed.
Recidivism rates vary widely depending on a number of factors, including the type of crime committed, the age and gender of the offender, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs. Studies have shown that individuals who receive education and vocational training while incarcerated are less likely to reoffend than those who do not. Additionally, access to mental health and substance abuse treatment can also significantly reduce recidivism rates.
One key factor impacting whether recidivism can be used as a measure of correctional success is the purpose of correctional facilities. Historically, prisons were often seen as a form of punishment rather than rehabilitation.
However, in recent years, there has been a growing movement towards using correctional facilities as a means of rehabilitation. This approach emphasizes education, job training, and therapy in order to help individuals successfully reintegrate into society upon their release.
Despite this shift towards rehabilitation, there are still many who argue that prisons should primarily serve as a form of punishment. They believe that harsher sentences and stricter conditions will deter individuals from committing crimes in the first place.
However, research has shown that this approach is not effective in reducing recidivism rates. In fact, individuals who are subjected to harsher conditions and longer sentences are often more likely to reoffend upon their release.
The impact of recidivism extends far beyond the individuals who reoffend. It can have significant societal and community impacts as well. For example, high recidivism rates can lead to increased crime rates and a greater strain on resources such as law enforcement, the justice system, and social services.
Furthermore, recidivism can also have a negative impact on the families and loved ones of those who reoffend. They may experience emotional and financial strain, as well as social stigma and isolation. Additionally, communities with high rates of recidivism may struggle with economic development and attracting businesses and residents, as the perception of safety and security is negatively affected.
A number of factors can contribute to high recidivism rates, including a lack of access to education and job training, mental health and substance abuse issues, and a lack of support and resources upon release.
In addition, the environment within correctional facilities themselves can also contribute to recidivism. Overcrowding, violence, and insufficient programming and resources can all make it difficult for individuals to successfully reintegrate into society upon their release.
Another factor that can contribute to high recidivism rates is the stigma and discrimination that individuals with criminal records often face. This can make it difficult for them to find employment, housing, and other basic necessities, which can lead to a return to criminal behavior. It is important for society to recognize the importance of second chances and to provide support and resources for individuals who are trying to turn their lives around after incarceration.
Despite the challenges, there are a number of correctional programs aimed at reducing recidivism rates. These include educational and vocational programs, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and reentry programs.
Research on the effectiveness of these programs in reducing recidivism is mixed. While some studies have shown positive results, others have found no significant impact. Further research is needed to better understand what types of programs are most effective in reducing recidivism.
One factor that may contribute to the mixed results of correctional programs is the varying needs and backgrounds of individuals in the criminal justice system. For example, a program that is effective for individuals with substance abuse issues may not be as effective for those with mental health concerns. Therefore, it is important for correctional programs to be tailored to the specific needs of each individual in order to increase their chances of success.
In recent years, there has been growing interest in alternatives to traditional incarceration, such as community supervision and restorative justice programs. The idea behind these programs is to provide individuals with the resources and support they need to successfully reintegrate into society without the negative impacts of traditional incarceration.
While there is limited research on the impact of these alternative programs on recidivism rates, early results are promising. For example, a study of a community supervision program in Hawaii showed a significant decrease in recidivism rates compared to traditional incarceration.
Another alternative to traditional incarceration is the use of electronic monitoring, such as ankle bracelets. This allows individuals to serve their sentence in their own homes, while still being monitored by authorities. While there are concerns about the effectiveness of electronic monitoring, studies have shown that it can be a successful alternative for certain types of offenders.
Restorative justice programs, which focus on repairing harm caused by criminal behavior and promoting healing for both victims and offenders, have also shown promise in reducing recidivism rates. These programs often involve mediation between the offender and victim, as well as community involvement in the rehabilitation process.
Education and job training programs have been shown to be effective in reducing recidivism rates. Providing individuals with the skills and training they need to secure employment upon their release can help to reduce the likelihood that they will reoffend.
However, access to these programs can be limited within correctional facilities, and funding for these programs can be difficult to secure. It’s important for policymakers to prioritize funding for these types of programs in order to help reduce recidivism rates.
Furthermore, education and job training programs not only reduce recidivism rates, but they also have a positive impact on the overall well-being of individuals who participate in them. These programs can provide a sense of purpose and accomplishment, as well as improve self-esteem and confidence. In addition, they can help individuals develop important life skills, such as problem-solving and communication, that can benefit them in all areas of their lives.
Mental health and substance abuse issues are common among incarcerated individuals, and can contribute to high recidivism rates. Addressing these issues through evidence-based treatment programs can help individuals successfully reintegrate into society upon their release.
However, many correctional facilities still lack adequate mental health and substance abuse treatment programs, and those that do exist may not be evidence-based or accessible to all individuals who need them.
Furthermore, the stigma surrounding mental health and substance abuse can prevent individuals from seeking help or receiving proper treatment while incarcerated. This can lead to a cycle of untreated mental health and substance abuse issues, resulting in continued criminal behavior and repeated incarceration.
Technology is being used in a variety of ways to help reduce recidivism rates. For example, electronic monitoring devices can be used to track individuals who are on probation or parole, helping to ensure compliance and reducing the likelihood of reoffending.
Other technological innovations, such as virtual reality programs and computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy, are being tested for their potential to improve mental health and reduce recidivism rates.
In addition, some prisons are implementing educational programs that use technology to teach inmates new skills and prepare them for reentry into society. These programs include online courses, vocational training through virtual reality simulations, and coding bootcamps. By providing inmates with marketable skills, these programs aim to reduce the likelihood of recidivism and help individuals successfully reintegrate into their communities.
The support of the community can be critical in helping individuals successfully reintegrate following their release from correctional facilities. Reentry programs, which provide individuals with resources and support upon their release, can help to facilitate this process.
However, many communities still stigmatize individuals who have been incarcerated, making it difficult for them to secure housing, employment, and other essential resources. It’s important to work towards reducing this stigma and providing support for formerly incarcerated individuals in order to reduce recidivism rates.
One way to reduce the stigma surrounding individuals who have been incarcerated is through education and awareness campaigns. By educating the public about the challenges faced by formerly incarcerated individuals and the importance of supporting their reentry into society, we can work towards creating a more welcoming and inclusive community.
Additionally, reentry programs should be tailored to meet the specific needs of each individual. This may include providing job training and placement services, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and assistance with securing housing and transportation. By addressing the unique challenges faced by each individual, we can increase the likelihood of their successful reintegration into society.
While recidivism is commonly used as a measure of correctional success, there are other indicators that may be more nuanced and comprehensive. For example, measuring improvements in educational attainment, employment, and mental health following release may provide a more holistic picture of correctional success.
Ultimately, recidivism can be a useful measure of correctional success when paired with other indicators and viewed within the context of the larger societal and community impacts of reoffending behavior.
In conclusion, reducing recidivism rates can be complex and challenging, but it’s a critical aspect of successful correctional facilities. By prioritizing rehabilitation, increasing access to education and job training, and providing evidence-based treatment for mental health and substance abuse issues, correctional facilities can help individuals successfully reintegrate into society and reduce the negative impacts of recidivism.
Another important measure of correctional success is the reduction of violence within the facility. When inmates feel safe and secure, they are more likely to engage in rehabilitation programs and have a better chance of successful reentry into society. Additionally, reducing violence within the facility can have a positive impact on the surrounding community, as it can decrease the likelihood of violent behavior from released inmates.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.