Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
16 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover the truth about Bobby Shmurda’s prison sentence.
Bobby Shmurda’s story is one of rags to riches and back to rags again. The Brooklyn-born rapper, whose legal name is Ackquille Pollard, rose to fame in the summer of 2014 with his hit song “Hot Boy.” The catchy tune became an instant sensation and propelled Shmurda into the spotlight, but it also marked the beginning of his downward spiral. In December of the same year, Bobby Shmurda was arrested along with several members of his GS9 crew on a slew of charges that would eventually lead to his incarceration.
Following his arrest in December 2014, Bobby Shmurda was charged with conspiracy to murder, reckless endangerment, and drug and gun possession. His bail was set at $2 million, a hefty sum that he was unable to pay. The rapper remained in jail for more than a year, during which time his legal woes mounted.
On September 9, 2016, Bobby Shmurda pleaded guilty to fourth-degree conspiracy and second-degree criminal weapons possession charges. He was sentenced to seven years in prison, with two years of credit for time served. This meant that Shmurda would have to serve five more years behind bars before he could be eligible for parole.
Shmurda’s case gained widespread attention and support from fans and fellow artists, who believed that he was unfairly targeted by law enforcement. Many argued that the charges against him were exaggerated and that he was being punished for his music and image. Despite the public outcry, Shmurda’s legal team was unable to secure a more lenient sentence, and he remains in prison to this day.
Some legal experts argued that Bobby Shmurda’s charges were inflated and that he was the victim of overzealous law enforcement. At the heart of his case was the allegation that he and members of his GS9 crew were involved in a series of shootings and drug trafficking activities. During his trial, prosecutors presented a series of videos and wiretaps that they said implicated Shmurda in these criminal activities. However, the defense argued that the evidence was circumstantial and lacked concrete proof of their client’s guilt.
Despite the defense’s arguments, Bobby Shmurda was ultimately convicted on multiple charges, including conspiracy to commit murder, weapons possession, and drug trafficking. He was sentenced to seven years in prison, with credit for time served, and is expected to be released in 2021.
The case against Shmurda and his crew highlighted the ongoing issue of police brutality and racial profiling in the criminal justice system. Many supporters of Shmurda argued that he was unfairly targeted because of his race and his status as a rising hip-hop artist. The case also sparked a larger conversation about the role of rap lyrics as evidence in criminal trials, with some arguing that the use of lyrics as evidence can be misleading and unfairly prejudicial.
Bobby Shmurda’s legal problems started long before his arrest in 2014. The rapper had been arrested several times throughout his teenage years for various crimes, including gun possession and probation violations. He had also been questioned in connection with several shootings in his Brooklyn neighborhood. However, it wasn’t until he was signed by Epic Records and his music gained widespread popularity that law enforcement started to take a keen interest in his activities.
After his arrest in December 2014, Bobby Shmurda spent more than a year in jail awaiting trial. During this time, he maintained his innocence and claimed that he was being unfairly targeted by law enforcement. However, as the evidence against him mounted, his legal team was forced to negotiate a plea deal. In September 2016, he was sentenced to seven years in prison.
While in prison, Bobby Shmurda continued to receive support from his fans and fellow musicians. Many believed that he had been unfairly targeted by law enforcement and that his sentence was too harsh. In 2020, after serving six years of his sentence, he was granted conditional release. However, he will remain on parole until 2026 and will have to adhere to strict conditions, including regular drug testing and avoiding contact with known gang members. Despite this, Bobby Shmurda has expressed his gratitude for the support he has received and his determination to turn his life around.
Bobby Shmurda’s seven-year sentence was widely criticized as excessive, given the nature of his charges and his prior criminal record. Some legal experts pointed out that he may have received a harsher sentence because of his public image as a controversial rapper, or because of the notoriety of his case. Others argued that his sentence was emblematic of the racial biases and disparities in the criminal justice system.
Additionally, some have speculated that Bobby Shmurda’s sentence was influenced by the fact that he refused to take a plea deal offered by prosecutors. By rejecting the plea deal, he may have angered the judge and prosecutors, leading to a harsher sentence.
Furthermore, Bobby Shmurda’s case brought attention to the issue of gang-related charges and their impact on sentencing. Many of the charges against him were related to his alleged involvement in a gang, which some argue unfairly inflates the severity of the charges and leads to longer sentences.
Bobby Shmurda’s prosecution raised questions about the fairness of the criminal justice system and the role that race and class play in the administration of justice. Some critics argued that Shmurda’s arrest and incarceration were part of a larger pattern of police harassment and profiling of black men in America. Others pointed to the disparities in the sentencing between white and black defendants, highlighting the systemic issues that lead to mass incarceration and the over-criminalization of minor offenses.
Furthermore, Shmurda’s case also shed light on the issue of plea bargaining and the pressure that defendants face to accept plea deals, even if they are innocent or have a weak case against them. In Shmurda’s case, he was offered a plea deal that would have resulted in a significantly shorter sentence, but he refused to take it because he maintained his innocence. This decision ultimately led to a longer sentence and raised questions about the fairness of the plea bargaining process and the pressure that defendants face to accept deals, even if they are not in their best interest.
Bobby Shmurda’s case also brought attention to the role of social media in the prosecution of criminal cases. Videos and images posted to Instagram and Vine were used as evidence against Shmurda and his crew, highlighting the growing power of social media in providing a window into people’s private lives. Some commentators argued that the proliferation of social media surveillance has led to a culture of voyeurism and increased the scrutiny of marginalized communities.
Furthermore, the use of social media in criminal cases has raised concerns about privacy and the potential for false accusations. In some instances, individuals have been wrongly accused based on social media posts that were taken out of context or manipulated. This has led to calls for greater regulation and oversight of social media platforms to ensure that they are not being used to unfairly target individuals or communities. As social media continues to play an increasingly prominent role in our lives, it is important to consider the potential consequences and implications of its use in the criminal justice system.
Bobby Shmurda’s charges included conspiracy to commit murder, reckless endangerment, and drug and gun possession. His co-defendants faced similar charges, including some related to the distribution of controlled substances. The prosecution argued that the defendants were part of a larger criminal enterprise that was responsible for a string of violent incidents and the sale of drugs in the Brooklyn area.
Despite the charges against them, Bobby Shmurda and his co-defendants maintained their innocence throughout the trial. They argued that the evidence presented by the prosecution was circumstantial and that they were being unfairly targeted due to their status as successful rappers. However, after a lengthy trial, the defendants were ultimately found guilty on multiple charges and sentenced to significant prison time.
Bobby Shmurda’s case also highlighted the complex relationship between hip-hop culture and the criminal justice system. Some critics argued that his arrest was part of a larger pattern of law enforcement targeting rappers and using their lyrics as evidence of criminal activity. Others pointed to the ways in which hip-hop provides a voice for marginalized communities and exposes social injustices, making it an easy target for those in power.
Bobby Shmurda’s attorney, Alex Spiro, spoke out about the complexities of his client’s case and the challenges he faced in defending him. Spiro argued that Shmurda’s sentence was excessive, given the nature of his charges, and that he was being unfairly targeted by law enforcement. He also pointed to the role of race and class in the criminal justice system and called for reform to address these disparities.
Bobby Shmurda’s imprisonment sparked a wide-ranging debate about the fairness of his sentence and the larger issues of criminal justice reform in America. Some fans rallied around him and expressed outrage at what they saw as a miscarriage of justice, while others argued that his prior criminal record and the evidence against him justified his punishment. The case also brought attention to the issue of bail reform, as Shmurda’s $2 million bail was seen as excessive and placed an unfair burden on his family and supporters.
After his release from prison in 2022, Bobby Shmurda will face new challenges in rebuilding his life and his career. Some experts have predicted that he will have difficulty getting his music career back on track, given the stigma of his incarceration and the changing landscape of the music industry. Others have pointed to the possibility of him using his experience to become a voice for criminal justice reform, much like Meek Mill and other high-profile rappers who have used their platforms to advocate for change.
Bobby Shmurda’s sentence has been criticized by many as excessive, given the nature of his charges and the evidence against him. Some legal experts have pointed to the disparities in the sentencing of white and black defendants, highlighting the systemic issues that contribute to the high rate of incarceration among people of color. Others have argued that his sentence was justified, given his prior criminal record and the severity of the charges against him.
Bobby Shmurda’s arrest and incarceration effectively put his music career on hold. The rapper was unable to capitalize on the success of his hit song, and his legal troubles overshadowed his potential as a rising star in the music industry. Some experts have argued that his incarceration may have actually benefitted his public image, creating a sense of mystique and rebellion that could help him attract a new fanbase upon his release from prison. Others have pointed to the difficulties he will face in re-gaining a foothold in the industry, given the stigma of his incarceration and the many other challenges he will face.
Bobby Shmurda’s case has highlighted many of the issues facing the criminal justice system in America today, from the over-criminalization of minor offenses to the role of race and class in the administration of justice. It has also shown the power of social media in shaping public perceptions and the need for increased transparency and accountability in law enforcement actions. Ultimately, the case of Bobby Shmurda serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of the criminal justice system and the need for reform to ensure that justice is truly blind.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.