Jail guard Amara Brown admits to DoorDash delivery for inmate
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
22 Jun 2023, Prisons, by
Discover the differences between federal and provincial prisons in Canada with our in-depth analysis.
The Canadian criminal justice system is highly complex and involves different levels of government, each with distinct responsibilities. One common question people often ask is, are prisons federal or provincial? The answer requires an in-depth look at the Canadian criminal justice system and its history, the roles of federal and provincial governments in prisons, differences between federal and provincial prisons, types of offenses tried at each level, sentencing guidelines, the impact of incarceration on individuals, families, and communities, inmate treatment and rehabilitation programs, the cost of running federal vs provincial prisons, controversies surrounding the Canadian prison system, and possible solutions to improve it.
The Canadian Criminal Justice System is divided into two main branches: criminal law and correctional law. Criminal law involves the prosecution of crimes and the imposition of sentences on convicted offenders. Correctional law deals with the management of offenders and their rehabilitation. The Criminal Code of Canada outlines the criminal law, while the federal Corrections and Conditional Release Act governs correctional law.
Within the criminal law branch, there are two types of offences: summary and indictable. Summary offences are less serious and carry a maximum penalty of six months in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. Indictable offences are more serious and carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The decision to prosecute an offence as summary or indictable is made by the Crown prosecutor.
Correctional law includes the management of offenders in federal and provincial institutions, as well as in the community. Offenders may be placed on probation, parole, or conditional release, depending on the severity of their offence and their risk to society. The goal of correctional law is to rehabilitate offenders and reintegrate them into society as law-abiding citizens.
The history of incarceration in Canada dates back to the 17th century when European colonizers established prisons as a means to punish offenders. Correctional institutions evolved over time from punitive to rehabilitative approaches. However, they still face criticisms for overcrowding, poor living conditions, and inadequate support for inmates to reintegrate into the community after their release.
In the 20th century, Canada saw a rise in the number of incarcerated individuals due to the implementation of mandatory minimum sentences and the war on drugs. This led to a disproportionate number of Indigenous and Black individuals being incarcerated, highlighting systemic racism within the criminal justice system.
In recent years, there has been a push for restorative justice practices, which prioritize repairing harm caused by crime and rehabilitating offenders rather than punishment. This approach has shown promising results in reducing recidivism rates and promoting healing for both victims and offenders.
The Canadian Constitution assigns different responsibilities to the federal and provincial governments. The federal government is responsible for criminal law, and the constitution gives it exclusive jurisdiction over felonies like drug trafficking, organized crime, and terrorism. The federal government also oversees the operation of federal prisons. On the other hand, the provinces are responsible for administering sentences for most crimes, including property offenses, assaults, and impaired driving, among others. The provinces operate and manage most provincial and territorial prisons.
However, there are instances where the federal government may also be involved in the administration of provincial and territorial prisons. For example, the federal government may provide funding for programs aimed at reducing recidivism rates or improving the conditions of provincial and territorial prisons. Additionally, the federal government may also be responsible for the incarceration of certain individuals, such as those who have been convicted of crimes that violate both federal and provincial laws.
Federal prisons, operated and managed by the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), typically house offenders serving sentences of two years or more. These prisons have higher security levels, centralized administration, and offer programs to address offenders’ physical, emotional, and psychological needs in preparation for their post-release reintegration. In contrast, provincial and territorial prisons, managed by provincial correctional services, house offenders serving shorter sentences and have lower security levels than federal prisons.
Another key difference between federal and provincial prisons in Canada is the types of offenders they house. Federal prisons tend to house more serious and violent offenders, such as those convicted of murder, while provincial prisons typically house offenders convicted of less serious crimes, such as theft or drug possession.
In terms of funding, federal prisons receive their funding directly from the federal government, while provincial prisons receive their funding from their respective provincial governments. This can lead to differences in the resources and programs available to offenders in each type of prison.
The federal government assumes the responsibility for prosecuting and sentencing cases related to organized crime, drug trafficking, white-collar crimes, and national security offenses. Provincial and territorial governments are responsible for prosecuting and sentencing all other cases, including property offenses, assaults, and impaired driving.
It is important to note that some offenses can be tried at both the federal and provincial levels, depending on the circumstances of the case. For example, if a drug trafficking operation involves individuals from multiple provinces or countries, it may be prosecuted at the federal level. Similarly, if an assault is committed against a government official or on federal property, it may also be tried at the federal level.
In addition, the severity of the offense can also impact whether it is tried at the federal or provincial level. For instance, if a property offense involves a high value of stolen goods, it may be tried at the federal level. On the other hand, if the value of the stolen goods is relatively low, it may be tried at the provincial level.
Sentencing guidelines vary depending on the nature of the crime and the offender’s background. Federal sentencing guidelines emphasize rehabilitation and reintegration into society and prioritize reducing recidivism. Provincial and territorial sentencing emphasizes punishment and deterrence, including fines and community service. Both levels prioritize public safety and protection from harm.
It is important to note that sentencing guidelines are not always followed strictly and judges have some discretion in determining the appropriate sentence. In some cases, mitigating or aggravating factors may be taken into account, such as the offender’s level of remorse or the severity of the harm caused to the victim. Additionally, alternative sentencing options such as restorative justice or diversion programs may be available in certain cases, particularly for first-time offenders or those with mental health or addiction issues.
Research indicates that incarceration has a significant impact on individuals, families, and communities. Incarceration can worsen mental health problems, increase the likelihood of reoffending, lead to unemployment, family disruption, and negative social attitudes towards individuals with criminal records. Additionally, over-representation of marginalized groups, such as Indigenous peoples, in the criminal justice system, places a significant burden on communities and perpetuates systemic racism.
Furthermore, the financial cost of incarceration is staggering. In the United States, it costs an average of $31,286 per year to incarcerate one person. This money could be better spent on education, healthcare, and social programs that address the root causes of crime. The high cost of incarceration also contributes to the cycle of poverty, as families struggle to pay for legal fees and support their incarcerated loved ones.
The treatment and conditions of prisoners in federal and provincial prisons have generated significant discussions and concerns. Federal prisons generally have better living conditions than provincial or territorial prisons due to their higher funding allocation and rigorous inspection procedures. Inmates in both types of prisons must receive essential healthcare, including access to medical treatment, medication, and counseling.
However, despite the regulations and guidelines in place, reports of mistreatment and abuse of prisoners still occur. In some cases, inmates have reported being subjected to physical and emotional abuse by prison staff, including the use of excessive force and solitary confinement. These incidents highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and accountability measures to ensure that prisoners are treated with dignity and respect.
Additionally, there is a growing recognition of the importance of providing education and vocational training programs to inmates. These programs can help prisoners develop new skills and knowledge, which can increase their chances of finding employment and reintegrating into society upon release. Some federal and provincial prisons have implemented successful education and training programs, but there is still a need for more widespread access to these opportunities.
The majority of inmates struggle to reintegrate into society after their release. The federal and provincial governments offer rehabilitation programs to support prisoners’ reintegration and reduce recidivism. However, the availability and type of programs vary across prisons. Federal prisons offer more extensive and intensive rehabilitation programs such as vocational training, education, and counseling, while provincial programs often focus on basic literacy training and employment readiness.
Despite the differences in rehabilitation programs, studies have shown that inmates who participate in any type of program are less likely to reoffend. However, the effectiveness of these programs can be hindered by overcrowding and understaffing in some prisons. This can lead to a lack of resources and support for inmates who are trying to improve their lives.
Another factor that can impact the success of rehabilitation programs is the length of an inmate’s sentence. Inmates with shorter sentences may not have enough time to complete a program, while those with longer sentences may become discouraged or lose motivation over time. Therefore, it is important for prisons to offer flexible and individualized programs that can accommodate the varying needs and circumstances of each inmate.
The cost of operating federal and provincial prisons varies due to differences in several factors such as size, security level, and inmate population. Federal prisons tend to be more expensive to operate than provincial prisons due to their higher security levels and more extensive programming. Additionally, the federal government is responsible for some of the higher-profile cases that require significant resources to prosecute and treat.
However, it is important to note that the cost of running prisons is not just limited to their operational expenses. There are also significant costs associated with the social and economic impact of incarceration, such as lost productivity and increased healthcare expenses. Studies have shown that investing in alternatives to incarceration, such as community-based programs and mental health services, can be more cost-effective in the long run and lead to better outcomes for both individuals and society as a whole.
The Canadian prison system has been a topic of significant debate over the years, with critics raising several concerns. Overcrowding, inadequate resources, funding cuts, and limited access to rehabilitation programs are common issues highlighted by critics. Other criticisms include the over-representation of marginalized groups, lack of standardized rehabilitation programs, and rising incarceration rates.
One of the major controversies surrounding the Canadian prison system is the use of solitary confinement. Critics argue that prolonged isolation can have severe psychological effects on inmates, and that it is often used as a form of punishment rather than rehabilitation. In 2019, the Canadian government passed legislation to limit the use of solitary confinement, but some advocates argue that more needs to be done to ensure that inmates are not subjected to inhumane treatment.
Another issue that has been raised is the treatment of Indigenous inmates. Indigenous people are over-represented in Canadian prisons, and many argue that the justice system is failing to address the root causes of this problem. Critics have called for more culturally sensitive programming and greater involvement of Indigenous communities in the justice system to address this issue.
To improve the effectiveness of the Canadian prison system, the federal and provincial governments must prioritize initiatives that aim to reduce recidivism and prevent people from entering the criminal justice system. They can do this through increased funding for rehabilitation programs, diversion programs, and access to mental healthcare. There is also a need for community-based supports for those transitioning out of prison to reduce the likelihood of reoffending. Improved collaboration between federal and provincial governments, as well as community stakeholders, is also necessary to improve the system’s efficiency, accountability, and innovation.
Another important solution to improve the Canadian prison system is to address the issue of over-incarceration. Canada has one of the highest incarceration rates among Western countries, and this has led to overcrowding in prisons and a strain on resources. To address this, the government can consider alternatives to incarceration, such as restorative justice programs, community service, and electronic monitoring. Additionally, the government can review sentencing laws and policies to ensure that they are fair, just, and evidence-based. By reducing over-incarceration, the Canadian prison system can become more effective, efficient, and humane.
The Canadian criminal justice system is complex, with federal and provincial governments playing unique roles in the administration of justice. Both levels of government have a responsibility to ensure public safety, order and protect the vulnerable population while balancing the need for programs that facilitate rehabilitation and successful reintegration into society. The ongoing debate about the role of federal and provincial governments in prisons underscores the need for continual evaluation, collaboration and innovation to improve the effectiveness of the Canadian prison system.
One area of concern is the over-representation of Indigenous peoples in Canadian prisons. While the federal government has taken steps to address this issue through initiatives such as the Gladue report, more needs to be done at both levels of government to address the root causes of Indigenous over-representation in the criminal justice system.
Another area of focus is the need for increased mental health support for inmates. Both federal and provincial governments have recognized the importance of mental health services in prisons, but more resources and funding are needed to ensure that inmates have access to the care they need to address underlying mental health issues that may contribute to criminal behavior.
Guard Amara Brown at Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center is charged with using DoorDash to deliver a meal to an inmate.
Ali Miles, a trans woman, sues NYC for $22 million, alleging mistreatment and discrimination after being placed in a male prison.
South Dakota lawmakers explore shifting responsibility for inmate legal defense fees from counties to the state.